CHAUDHRI: Fired but not forgotten – when replacement employee's bonus becomes evidence
Canadian women's hockey players go viral over Olympic silver-medal stuffies reactions
Why Macklin Celebrini's Olympic play has Maple Leafs players in awe
KINSELLA: Hamas covertly targeted Canadian-funded NGOs and charities in Gaza
Man, 22, allegedly sexually assaulted 'youth' after giving her marijuana
WARMINGTON: Hockey fans to pack pubs, legions, arenas for gold medal breakfast
Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
CHAUDHRI: Fired but not forgotten – when replacement employee's bonus becomes evidence
If the business thrives after a senior employee’s departure, courts may look at what comparable employees earned during the notice period
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Employers beware – a replacement employee’s paycheque could haunt you in court.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Don't have an account? Create Account
In the recent case of Warren v Canaccord Genuity Corp, Ontario’s Superior Court has made clear that when it comes to bonus damages, dismissed executives may point to bonuses paid out even after their termination to support their own claim for damages in court.
CHAUDHRI: Fired but not forgotten – when replacement employee's bonus becomes evidence Back to video
In Mr. Warren’s case, that argument translated into a $2.5 million damages award.
Mr. Warren, a managing director in the mining group at Canaccord Genuity Corp, was terminated without cause at the age of 52 after 18 years of service. The Court awarded him a 21-month notice period.
But the real battle ground was around how his bonus should be calculated over that 21 month post-termination period.
Like many senior investment bankers, Mr. Warren’s compensation was primarily bonus-driven. His base salary had remained static for years while his annual income depended largely on his bonus, which was tied to two factors: individual performance and the size of Canaccord’s Canadian Capital Markets bonus pool.
Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Over his 18 years of service, Mr. Warren’s bonus fluctuated dramatically, ranging from under $250,000 to more than $3 million.
CHAUDHRI: 'Ghost job' postings – do’s and don’ts for employers
CHAUDHRI: Employment consequences for social media posting
CHAUDHRI: CBC North whistleblower – constructive dismissal and lessons for employers
While Canaccord urged the court to use the familiar method of averaging bonuses over the three years preceding Warren’s termination, the court agreed with Mr. Warren who proposed a relatively novel method. Mr. Warren argued that the proper measure was not what he earned in the past, but what his successors, who assumed his responsibilities, actually earned during the 21-month notice period.
Wrongful dismissal damages are meant to place an employee in the position he would have been in had reasonable notice been provided. That exercise should be forward-looking. That said, judges have routinely awarded bonuses by looking backward, at previous performance to award damages.
Arguably this approach is reasonable as history can be a very reasonable predictor of what lies ahead – but not always.
During Mr. Warren’s notice period, Canaccord’s capital markets business was highly profitable. The bonus pool grew. The mining group evolved. Managing directors in comparable roles materially benefited from that upswing.
The court found that Mr. Warren would have as well.
In these circumstances, relying on a historical average risked understating his loss. The result was a damages award reflecting the compensation actually paid out during that profitable period – approximately $2.5 million in bonus-related damages.
In short, the replacement’s paycheque became evidence.
A Lesson To Employers: For employers, particularly in finance, tech, and other bonus-driven industries, the decision is a warning. Damages may not be capped by historical earnings. If the business thrives after a senior employee’s departure, courts may look at what comparable employees earned during the notice period.
That creates real exposure. A strong post-termination year can dramatically increase damages. Compensation of replacement hires may become central in litigation. Restructuring titles will not insulate an employer if the substance of the role remains comparable.
A Lesson for Executives: For executives, the message is equally significant. Damages are about what you would have earned, not simply what you used to earn. Where compensation is tied to performance metrics or bonus pools, courts may look to peers and replacements to quantify that loss.
In short, if your replacement prospers, that prosperity may be relevant.
– This column was co-written by employment lawyer Sunira Chaudhri and her associate Samantha Khaouli
Have a workplace problem? Maybe I can help! Email me at sunira@worklylaw.com and your question may be featured in a future column.
The content of this article is general information only and is not legal advice.
Share this Story : Toronto Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Canadian women's hockey players go viral over Olympic silver-medal stuffies reactions Olympics
Canadian women's hockey players go viral over Olympic silver-medal stuffies reactions
Why Macklin Celebrini's Olympic play has Maple Leafs players in awe Toronto Maple Leafs
Why Macklin Celebrini's Olympic play has Maple Leafs players in awe
KINSELLA: Hamas covertly targeted Canadian-funded NGOs and charities in Gaza Columnists
KINSELLA: Hamas covertly targeted Canadian-funded NGOs and charities in Gaza
Man, 22, allegedly sexually assaulted 'youth' after giving her marijuana Toronto & GTA
Man, 22, allegedly sexually assaulted 'youth' after giving her marijuana
WARMINGTON: Hockey fans to pack pubs, legions, arenas for gold medal breakfast Toronto & GTA
WARMINGTON: Hockey fans to pack pubs, legions, arenas for gold medal breakfast
