My view of Hannah Arendt remains critical. I do not treat her as a secular prophet whose every sentence must be repeated with the solemn face of an academic altar boy. Arendt was sometimes wrong, sometimes unfair, sometimes too attached to her own conceptual loyalties.

And yet some of her recognitions remain indispensable.

One of them concerns suffering. Arendt understood that suffering does not automatically make a community wiser or more just. It can produce solidarity, warmth, courage, even fraternity. But it can also close people inside the circle of a shared wound, where every external question is immediately heard as accusation, betrayal, or threat.

Then the world disappears.

Not the world as a collection of things, but the world as the space between people: the place of speech, distinction, judgment, and responsibility. Dark times are not only times of violence. They are also times in which the common space collapses, and speech is immediately sorted into loyalty or hostility.

This is why Arendt’s distinction between fraternity and friendship matters. Fraternity is........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)