How a War We Did Not Choose Became a Crisis We Cannot Escape

The United States entered the Iran conflict under circumstances that never persuaded most Americans. The case for pre‑emption was not made convincingly, the threat was not framed as imminent, and the public sensed from the beginning that the decision to strike was driven more by political momentum than by strategic necessity. Polling has consistently shown that a large majority of Americans believe the war was avoidable, and an overwhelming majority oppose the deployment of US ground forces. Yet despite this profound skepticism, the country now finds itself entangled in a conflict whose consequences it cannot simply walk away from. The war may not have been chosen by the public, but the public is now bound to its outcomes.

This is the essence of the dilemma. A conflict that lacked broad support has nonetheless produced a set of strategic and economic realities that affect every household, every business, and every ally. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is not an abstraction. It is a chokepoint through which roughly twenty percent of the world’s energy supply flows, and its disruption reverberates instantly through global markets. Americans who opposed the war now face the consequences of a crisis that threatens fuel prices, inflation, and economic stability. They did not choose the conflict, but they cannot escape its effects.

The same is true for America’s allies. European governments did not advocate for escalation, and Gulf Arab partners did not seek a confrontation that would destabilize their region and expose their economies to severe shocks. Yet they, too, are now caught in the gravitational pull of a conflict they did not initiate. Their shipping lanes are threatened, their energy security is compromised, and........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)