menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Oil Outage and The Cost of (Missing) Context

33 0
28.03.2026

I held this piece for three weeks to avoid reacting to the fog of war. 

In the past, societies accepted far more than higher oil prices. During WWII, Americans and Europeans lived under food rationing for years. Civilians adjusted daily life around national survival. Industrial production was completely redirected.

That level of sacrifice was understood as normal. Today, people are spoiled rotten.

Today’s reaction to a temporary rise in oil prices feels detached from reality. A short-lived spike in fuel costs is framed as a crisis, more important than the right for women to show hair or all people to dance in public.

The recent spike in oil prices during the Iran conflict was widely presented as a major economic shock. But in reality, it was brief. It should be compared to sustained shocks like the sustained energy shock following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Before calling the current spike extraordinary, ask how it compares to previous oil shocks. This increase is not even among the top five oil shocks of the last fifty years. 

The recent oil spike, during Trump’s 2nd term, peaked at roughly $119 per barrel in March, before quickly falling back toward $100. The surge was sharp but short-lived.

Here are famous examples of higher oil prices for comparison, adjusted to 2026 dollars:

~$180+ per barrel (June–July 2008; Bush, Obama): At the peak of the global commodity boom, driven by rapid demand growth from China and other emerging economies, oil surged to nearly $145 per barrel nominal. Adjusted for inflation, that exceeds $180 today. Prices remained elevated for months before collapsing during the global financial crisis.

~$140–$150 per barrel (March 2022; Biden): Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Brent crude reached roughly $133 nominal. Adjusted for inflation, that places it well above $140. Prices remained near or above $100 for months, making it one of the most sustained energy shocks in recent history.

~$130+ per barrel (2011–2012; Obama): During the aftermath of the Arab Spring and instability across major oil-producing regions, oil prices repeatedly exceeded $110 nominal. In real terms, this translates to well above $130 today, sustained across multiple years.

~$120–$130 per barrel (early 1980s oil shock; Carter, Reagan): Following the Iranian Revolution and the Iran–Iraq War, oil prices surged. There is an irony in this: decades later, instability tied to Iran is influencing global oil markets, though today’s spike remains far smaller and shorter-lived, and far more kvetched about.

~$115–$125 per barrel (late 1970s oil crisis; Carter): The 1979 oil shock was also triggered by the Iranian Revolution. In real terms, this period remains one of the most severe energy disruptions of the past half-century.

None of these comparisons is meant to claim that current oil prices cannot rise further. The war is ongoing. Future disruptions and policy changes could change the picture. Releasing oil reserves or reducing carbon taxes can reduce prices, as could boots on the ground. Escalations to war or more sunken tankers would raise prices. 

But the reality over the past four weeks is clearer than refined oil. The current spike was brief. It does not approach the severe oil shocks of the past half-century, including sustained peaks of 2008, 2011–2012, and 2022.

The major difference is blame and discussion. Readers deserve that context.

We are also living through a different kind of war, one shaped not only by events on the ground but also by mainstream media and social media narratives that amplify panic. That distortion matters, especially when it is coming from inside the house.

I’ll end with a point that once was shouted loudly by eco-warriors, now controversial: Higher oil prices are not purely negative. They accelerate shifts toward electric vehicles, hybrids, and energy efficiency. Even now, people are adjusting behavior, driving less, choosing more efficient transport, and reconsidering energy use. Yet even that shift is often framed negatively to encourage blame rather than behavior change.


© The Times of Israel (Blogs)