When Equality Is Branded a Crime
Israel’s decision to resume land registration in Judea and Samaria is not annexation or a breach of international law, but a lawful administrative measure to restore equality, transparency, and order after years of Palestinian Authority violations ignored by the international community.
Embed from Getty Imageswindow.gie=window.gie||function(c){(gie.q=gie.q||[]).push(c)};gie(function(){gie.widgets.load({id:'eNW27zb5QzNAvKGEi-4XcA',sig:'buitVP3bDRs5yqPjvYPp6WHhXy67ev24_39iHFAvEZY=',w:'594px',h:'396px',items:'2261832457',caption: false ,tld:'com',is360: false })});
The international outcry that followed Israel’s recent decision to resume land registration procedures in Judea and Samaria is a case study in selective outrage. Foreign media outlets and diplomats rushed to label the decision a “gross violation of international law,” even as they ignored the facts on the ground and the legal reality of what Israel actually approved.
The decision in question is not a political move, a sovereignty declaration, or an annexation by stealth. It is an administrative measure in civil and property law, designed to restore transparency, equality, and legal order in a domain that has long been distorted by discrimination, secrecy, and systematic violations of binding agreements. The real question, therefore, is not why Israel acted now, but why the international community has tolerated years of........
