Most will remember that Katrina Kariko and Drew Weissman won the Nobel Prize in 2023 for their mRNA vaccine research that resulted in a very efficacious vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. We expressed our gratitude to them for saving many lives during the Covid-19 pandemic. Surprisingly, some weeks ago, headlines in newspapers stated “Lifesaving mRNA vaccine technology appears targeted under Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.” and “Trump administration at ‘war’ with mRNA technology.” Science is facing an existential crisis. Trust for science seems iffy now in many countries.

There is greater denial of science now than before. Consequently, the role of science and scientific knowledge in decision-making for social good appears questionable. However, those of us who believe in the relevance and power of science need to defend science without being abrasive. Science is anchored on a set of principles. Based on experimentation, observation and logical argumentation, it generates an organized body of knowledge most of which are applicable for public good, either immediately or in the longer term.

Advertisement

The method of science makes its conclusions universally applicable. Practitioners of science derive conclusions on their own, obtain views on these from their peers, publish results in widely-read journals, which then are replicated by some peers. Sometimes, conclusions need to be modified. The process is repeated until the results turn out to be broadly applicable, that is, generalizable. In nonexperimental sciences, logical inferences are deduced based on observations that are desig – ned to be free of subjectivity and bias. This nature of drawing conclusions in science makes the conclusions reliable and inclusive. Therefore, science has play – ed a major........

© The Statesman