As Donald Trump’s 8 p.m. deadline crept closer by the minute, accompanied by increasingly furious posts from the president online, the last-minute scramble to achieve a ceasefire by diplomacy became ever more desperate. Within the final 90 minutes it was announced that there would be a two-week pause in the fighting, based on a ten-point plan submitted by Iran. Details emerged only gradually overnight, alongside predictable claims of victory from all sides. The truth, as ever, will take longer to emerge.

What is clear is that this is not a peace deal, nor even a fully implemented ceasefire. It is, at best, a pause – fragile, conditional and already under strain.

This is not a peace deal, nor even a fully implemented ceasefire. It is, at best, a pause – fragile, conditional and already under strain

This is not a peace deal, nor even a fully implemented ceasefire. It is, at best, a pause – fragile, conditional and already under strain

Here is what the ceasefire means for now.

For Iran, the most important fact is survival. The Ayatollah’s regime remains intact and would likely have claimed victory under almost any outcome. It has secured a temporary respite from sustained strikes, buying time to regroup, even as heavy sanctions remain firmly in place. Crucially, Tehran retains control over the Strait of Hormuz, now with the added ability, under the terms reportedly discussed, to charge transit fees on shipping, an unprecedented shift in the economics of global energy flows. Yet the limits are equally clear: two weeks is not enough to rebuild damaged military or industrial capacity in any meaningful way. For the Iranian people, there are so far no clear answers about their future freedom.

Israel, by contrast, is left in a sort of limbo. Just as the hostages in Gaza were the ultimate throttle on Israel’s actions in Gaza, holding it back from total victory, in this war the Strait of Hormuz and........

© The Spectator