In conventional diplomacy, delay is treated as a temporary obstacle. Negotiations stall, deadlines slip, and parties assume that more time will eventually yield compromise. With the Islamic Republic of Iran, that assumption is not merely incorrect. It is strategically dangerous.

Delay is not a malfunction in Iran’s diplomacy. It is the mechanism itself.

For more than four decades, Western policymakers have misread Iranian behavior as situational, driven by internal politics or negotiating complexity. In reality, it is structural. The regime in Tehran operates according to a coherent strategic logic in which negotiations are not instruments of resolution, but instruments of avoidance.

At the center of that logic is time.

Iran is negotiating — to stretch time

Iran does not delay negotiations in order to improve its bargaining position. Delay is its bargaining position. Each extension, each procedural dispute, each open-ended ceasefire is designed to produce a singular outcome: the preservation and advancement of its strategic capabilities while external pressure dissipates.

This strategy cannot be separated from the regime’s ideological foundation.

The Islamic........

© The Leader