Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

EVENTS Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Trump pans tariffs ruling

Supreme Court tariffs takeaways

Content from Google Cloud

Republicans breathe sigh of relief as Supreme Court axes Trump tariffs House | 19 minutes ago

The Memo: Trump fumes at Supreme Court justices who knocked down tariffs Administration | 19 minutes ago

Trump’s Iran warning gives UK whiplash over Chagos island deal International | 19 minutes ago

Ontario premier allows early alcohol sales for US-Canada gold medal game In The Know | 6 hours ago

Pentagon blocked from using UK bases in potential Iran strike Defense | 7 hours ago

US sets up gold-medal game against Canada at the Olympics by cruising past Slovakia AP Sports | 8 hours ago

What the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling could mean for your wallet Nexstar Media Wire News | 8 hours ago

Trump lashes out at Barrett, Gorsuch for ruling against tariffs Administration | 9 hours ago

The Memo: Trump fumes at Supreme Court justices who knocked down tariffs

Less than six weeks before the 2020 election, President Trump stepped into the White House Rose Garden to fete his newest Supreme Court nominee. 

“She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials, and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution,” he enthused. “Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Barrett would duly be confirmed, the third newly minted Supreme Court justice of Trump’s first term. The first had been Neil Gorsuch, back in 2017. At an event to mark Gorsuch’s swearing-in, Trump called him “a man of great and unquestioned integrity … of unmatched qualifications.”

That was then, this is now.

On Friday, Barrett and Gorsuch joined four of their colleagues in delivering a decisive 6-3 defeat to Trump on tariffs.

Trump singled out the duo’s role in the decision. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families, if you want to know the truth. The two of them,” he said.

The president, speaking during a hastily arranged appearance in the White House briefing room, also contended he was “ashamed of certain members of the court,” complained that they were being “fools and lapdogs,” and branded the six justices who had defied him a “disgrace to our nation.”

Such an attack is at once startling and unsurprising. 

Trump has repeatedly attacked judges who have ruled in ways that displease him. The targets have run the gamut from lower courts to the Supreme Court. 

Last March, he complained, “Unlawful Nationwide Injunctions by Radical Left Judges could very well lead to the destruction of our Country!”

Last May, after the high court blocked him from using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 as he wanted, the president complained that “The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do.”

In the same social media post, he characterized the ruling as one that held that “the worst murderers, drug dealers, gang members and even those who are criminally insane” were “not allowed to be forced out” fast enough.

So, his volcanic reaction to Friday’s ruling was part of a pattern in which he assails dissenting voices, on the bench or elsewhere, any time they resist him. But it was also an indication of what a seismic political setback he had encountered.

The decision struck down many of Trump’s tariffs, finding that the president’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 was unconstitutional. 

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that Trump appeared to be reserving for himself “the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time.”

The words within IEEPA that the president leaned on to make such an assertion “cannot bear such weight,” Roberts noted.

Trump can, and almost certainly will, seek to impose or maintain tariffs using other laws and powers — but those too could face legal challenge. Businesses, at home and abroad, will fret about yet another period of tariff uncertainty. And there is the vexing question of whether refunds will be offered for the payments already made, under tariffs now ruled illegal. 

The bottom line is that a conservative Supreme Court has pulled out the keystone around which Trump’s whole trade policy is constructed. Tariffs were Trump’s signature policy on that front, and the Supreme Court has, for now, erased many of them.

“It’s my opinion that the court has been swayed by foreign interests and a political movement that is far smaller than people would ever think,” Trump lamented, without offering evidence.

There’s another factor to consider, too. Trump’s views on numerous important topics — from health care to abortion to relations with North Korea — have swung all over the place during his decades in public life.

Yet, his stance on tariffs, and his disdain for the evangelists of “free trade,” have been unusually consistent. He has long held the view that the United States suffers because of unfair trade policies and that tariffs are a large part of the answer.

Footage can still be found of him, in the late 1980s, complaining to Oprah Winfrey on her talk show about how Japanese manufacturers — an American economic nemesis of the time, roughly equivalent to China now — “dump everything” and were “beating the hell out of this country.”

“I’d make our allies pay their fair share,” Trump told Winfrey, apparently referring to higher tariffs.

Trump’s Friday fury is plainly motivated, at least in part, by a Supreme Court to which he appointed one-third of the members, thwarting him for now.

The tensions could flare again on Tuesday, when the justices are expected to attend Trump’s State of the Union address. Trump told The Hill’s Julia Manchester during his Friday briefing that the justices were “invited — barely” to the address and that he could not “care less” whether they come.

It would not be the first example of friction in those surroundings, of course. 

Back in 2010, then-President Obama criticized the Citizens United ruling as likely to “open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections.”

Justice Samuel Alito, sitting just in front of Obama, appeared to mouth the words “not true” in response.

Obama, of course, had prefaced his criticism of the ruling with a recognition of “due deference to the separation of powers.” He did not suggest the conservative justices had disgraced their families.

The times, and the president, are very different now.

The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Administration News

McConnell: Congressional role in trade policy ‘not an inconvenience to ...

Vance: Supreme Court tariff decision represents ‘lawlessness from the court’

Rand Paul lauds Supreme Court tariff decision: ‘In defense of our Republic’

Johnson says Congress, administration will ‘determine the best path ...

Hundreds of students suspended, schools under close watch over anti-ICE walkouts

Pritzker tells Trump to ‘cut the check’ after tariffs ruling

5 takeaways as Supreme Court strikes blow to Trump’s tariffs

Moreno calls for GOP to codify scuttled Trump tariffs

Judge throws out ruling backing Trump mass detention policy

Massie seeks to undo Trump’s pro-glyphosate executive order

FCC chair calls for ‘patriotic, pro-America’ broadcaster programs for 250th

Johnson denies request for Jesse Jackson to lie in honor in Capitol

Gorsuch’s ‘told you so’ moment on Trump’s tariffs

Supreme Court strikes down bulk of Trump’s tariffs

Read: Supreme Court ruling on Trump tariffs

Pence praises tariff ruling as win for Americans and separation of powers

Trump to impose new 10 percent tariff on all countries after Supreme Court ...

Letitia James takes victory lap after Supreme Court tariffs ruling

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?

© The Hill