AI use by the US government is ballooning. And the lack of transparency is troubling
On 14 April, the Trump administration quietly acknowledged the widespread use of AI to automate government processes. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) disclosed a staggering 3,611 active or planned use cases for AI across the federal government. The list has ballooned by 70% from the one published in the final year of the Biden administration, and includes many disturbing-seeming plans to hand over sensitive governmental functions to AI.
Scanning this list, many readers may find many causes for alarm. It represents a transfer of decision processes from human to machine on a massive scale over matters of individual freedom, public health and wellbeing, nuclear reactor safety and more.
Consider these examples. The Health and Human Services’ (HHS) office of administration for children and families hired the world’s “scariest AI company”, Palantir – notorious for its work on behalf of the military, the CIA and ICE – to scan all grant applications to flag those not ideologically aligned with the administration’s dictates. The Federal Bureau of Prisons is developing an AI system to assess the “potential for misconduct for newly admitted inmates”, routing people into high-security confinement before they have actually done anything wrong in their custody. These read like programs fit for a Philip K Dick or George Orwell novel.
Other use cases insert AI into life & death decision making. The Department of Veterans Affairs is developing an AI that will listen in on calls to the veterans crisis line, and then gather information from external databases to assess the mental state and suicide risk of the caller.
The Department of Energy is testing the use of AI to control nuclear reactors, targeting a way to autonomously respond to potential nuclear safety incidents. Here’s one that’s disturbing for its retirement, rather than its deployment: The State Department has ended a program to use AI to forecast mass civilian killings, which had been intended to aid conflict prevention.
While it’s easy to raise questions about these and similar........
