Washington delivered two verdicts on Pakistan this week. On October 8 the IMF announced a staff-level agreement worth about $1.21 billion. A day earlier the World Bank reported that poverty at $3 a day had risen 6.4 percentage points between 2018–19 and 2024–25. One said the economy was stabilizing. The other said its people were getting poorer. Every paper ran both. None ran them together. That is the week in one sentence. The news pages transcribed, the opinion pages diagnosed, and the two never met. 

The minister writes the story

Read the IMF coverage in all four papers and you get one article four times: the amount, the Board date, the minister’s satisfaction, the market’s rally. The only consequential fact was buried. Profit reported that the next $1 billion tranche depends on amending Pakistan’s SOE laws. Parliament is rewriting national law to a creditor’s timetable because the state will not otherwise govern its own companies. That is a story about who actually makes policy in Pakistan. It was filed as a line item.

Above all, nobody supplied the context that makes the story. This is Pakistan’s 25th IMF programme. After 25 programmes in roughly seven decades, a tranche is not news. Every programme has promised structural reform, SOE restructuring, a broader tax base and an end to the stop-go cycle. Every one has ended with reserves rebuilt, growth suppressed and the structure untouched, until the next crisis and the next programme. A press with any memory would have led with one question: why should the 25th work when the previous 24 did not? Instead it reported the agreement as an achievement, as it has 24 times before.

Then came the announcements: nine DISCOs privatised by December 2027, a Rs2 trillion SME-financing ambition, first-loss cover for small lenders, a possible phase-out of gas geysers for seven million households. None carried the one paragraph that should be compulsory: what happened last time? And the cast never changed. Finance, the SBP, the IMF and the World Bank framed everything. The Planning Commission, which owns the development budget, but never presents thought or research on the economy.

The policy nobody read, the debate nobody remembered

Profit reported “the first national housing policy in nearly 25 years” on October 6. Cabinet had approved it on August 10. The press was two months late and still did not read it. Had anyone opened the document on the Housing Ministry’s website, they would have found “medium- to high-rise vertical development,” density within urban boundaries, a call on provinces to........

© The Friday Times