Texas Elections Officials Sound Alarms About Glitch-Ridden Voter Registration System
1 Trending: Justice Department Fires Multiple Prosecutors Who Weaponized FACE Act Against Pro-Life Americans
2 Trending: Spanberger Won’t Decide Fate Of Gun Control Bills Until After Virginia’s Gerrymandering Referendum
3 Trending: At Coachella, Sabrina Carpenter Learns There’s A Fine Line Between An Audience And A Woke Mob
4 Trending: Democrats Turned On Eric Swalwell Because He Was In The Way, Not Because They Have Morals
Texas Elections Officials Sound Alarms About Glitch-Ridden Voter Registration System
One county elections official described the ‘deflection and gaslighting’ from the Secretary of State’s office as ‘diabolical.’
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
Local Texas election officials have much to say about the state’s new centralized voter registration system — not much of it kind.
A Texas Association of County Election Officials (TACEO) survey of members is 24 pages of frustration and aggravation. The February survey, obtained by The Federalist, sought feedback on the biggest administration burdens faced by election officials using the database. TACEO got lots of feedback.
“Going into TEAM to get ANY work done only to see it either spin or not function at all,” one elections official said of the Texas Election Administration Management (TEAM) 2.0, a glitch-ridden update to the original clunky database. “Not being able to have access to SO MANY previous functions in old TEAM. Very frustrating!”
“County Chairs are frustrated — they’re hitting barriers when entering candidates for the big Primary,” another elections administrator complained.
One respondent summed up the situation in three words: “SLOWER THAN DIRT.” It was a common refrain.
‘Deflection and Gaslighting’
More frustrating, it seems, is the response — or lack thereof — from Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson’s office and the vendor of the $17 million system, Civix. The Louisiana-based company claims a majority of states use its “real-world tested applications” to ensure “the integrity of voter and election-related data.”
Frontline election........
