1 Trending: Men, Get Ahold Of Your Lindsay Clancy-Supporting Girlfriends And Wives Before It’s Too Late

2 Trending: Exclusive: 142 State Lawmakers Urge Trump To Appoint Census Director To Ensure ‘Accurate’ 2030 Citizen Count

3 Trending: The Senate Race In Alaska Is What A Rigged Election Looks Like

4 Trending: Chinese Social Media Chatter Indicates Trump’s Birth Tourism Crackdown Is Starting To Work

Lindsay Clancy’s Pro-Abortion Fans Care More About Her Circumstances Than Her Children

The Clancy case raises a larger moral question: What happens when circumstances become the rationale for defending the unthinkable?

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

In response to the ongoing trial of Lindsay Clancy, the woman who killed her three children in 2023, it seems women across the country are trying to quiet their consciences by swapping out pink pussy hats for pink T-shirts. These sympathizers have also raised more than $1 million for Clancy’s supportive parents. That stunning sum is akin to awarding a Golden Globe to an actress who publicly credits killing her offspring with advancing her career.

Was Clancy pro-abortion? Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn’t. Either way, the more revealing question isn’t what Clancy believed about abortion; it’s what the women rallying around her believe about when it’s morally acceptable to take innocent life. Thus, scarier than the woman in the courtroom, sitting in a wheelchair and staring blankly into space, are the hordes of women who may be finding solace and justification for the intentional ending of innocent human life somewhere else in the life cycle.

Is invoking Clancy’s mental illness to mitigate responsibility for her actions fundamentally different from invoking “health care” to justify abortion because a woman believes giving birth would cause her undue stress or derail her professional life? Abortion supporters can cite “reproductive freedom” all they want. That’s how it starts. The methodical murder of more than 65 million unborn human beings since Roe v. Wade is nothing more than permissible slaughter. But more important than which euphemisms we use for abortion and filicide is the message being sent to women who may come to believe........

© The Federalist