1 Trending: AOC’s ‘Woke 1’ Comment Reveals The Left Is Planning To Make ‘Woke 2’ Even Worse

2 Trending: Texts: Fauci And Friends Covered Up Concerns About The Covid Vax And Miscarriages

3 Trending: Freezing Your Eggs Is Bad Biology. Doing It At 36 Like AOC Is Even Worse

4 Trending: New Jersey’s ‘Software Error’ That Registered 6,600 Noncitizens Is No Accident

Suddenly The Radical Pro-Trans Medical Organization WPATH Tells A Court That It’s Just Guessing

Regulators are using WPATH standards as a set of absolutely certain and inflexible scientific rules at the exact moment that WPATH is shrugging and calling the whole thing a highly debatable guess.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

For years, the “standards of care” adopted by the radical World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) have been treated as incontestable expert guidance. Deep blue states like California have used WPATH standards to expand access to transgender interventions for children, and to force health insurance companies to cover sex-rejecting procedures. Believe in science!

But WPATH just told a court that it’s only guessing, and its guidance is all just an opinion. Challenged, the science ran away.

🚨 WPATH has conceded in court that its "Standards of Care" is merely an opinion. WPATH says it represents one side of an unsettled scientific debate marked by uncertainty — and physicains & orgs that rely on WPATH as the standard of care must bear "independent responsibility."/1 pic.twitter.com/BpL5vXnsII— SEGM (@segm_ebm) August 11, 2026

🚨 WPATH has conceded in court that its "Standards of Care" is merely an opinion. WPATH says it represents one side of an unsettled scientific debate marked by uncertainty — and physicains & orgs that rely on WPATH as the standard of care must bear "independent responsibility."/1 pic.twitter.com/BpL5vXnsII

Rewind the tape for a moment, and start with the way WPATH’s standards of care have been used. As The Federalist has reported many times, California regulators have used those standards as a set of incontestable requirements established by rigorous........

© The Federalist