1 Trending: How Israel ‘Chain-Ganged’ The Trump Administration Into War Against Iran

2 Trending: How To Stay Sane And Not Look Stupid When Talking About The Iran War

3 Trending: I Wish GOP Senators Got As Excited About The SAVE Act As They Do About War

4 Trending: Thanks To Democrats, Potential Iranian Terrorists Are Already On American Soil

Virginia Court: We Can’t Say Whether Dems’ Gerrymandering Is Illegal Until After They Try It

The judge ruled that the constitutional questions about the election needed to be answered after votes were cast.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

A Virginia circuit court ruled that a referendum vote enabling Democrats to gerrymander U.S. congressional districts can move ahead, despite leaving open the possibility that the referendum itself could be illegal.

The case involved the City of Lynchburg suing to “pause early voting” or have the court “answer questions about the legality” of the referendum vote, as reported by Cardinal News. If approved by voters, the measure would allow Democrats to redraw the congressional map to gerrymander Virginia’s congressional districts to eliminate four Republican seats, giving Democrats a 10-1 advantage.

As The Federalist reported, Republicans have apparently been relying on untrustworthy courts to stop the referendum, while essentially ignoring a get-out-the-vote effort. They now have two days before early voting starts on March 6, with “Election Day” set for April 21.

In a Monday ruling, Judge Patrick Yeatts of the Lynchburg Circuit Court refused to rule on the substance of a lawsuit aimed at stopping the referendum vote from taking place, leaving the issue in the hands of the Virginia Supreme Court.

Yeatts also said that the constitutional questions about the election needed to be answered........

© The Federalist