The most alarming detail in the City of Launceston councillors' decision to hit some property owners with a 40 per cent rates increase isn't just the size of the rate hike; it's the candid admission by councillors that they voted for a sweeping policy shift without understanding its real-world fallout.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Login or signup to continue reading

Councillor Tim Walker's admission that he "did not realise the implications" exposes a systemic failure in council governance: approving complex rate strategies on paper without first demanding granular impact modelling. Local democracy breaks down when elected representatives act as rubber stamps for policy documents rather than probing how those decisions affect household budgets.

Lumping lifestyle properties and cost-neutral hobby farms into the same rate tier as profit-generating commercial hubs fails basic economic logic. Residents like Abby Collins aren't running high-margin enterprises; they are land-rich and cash-neutral. Broad-brush rates strategies designed to "even things out" end up penalising residents who receive few, if any, commercial council services in exchange for their tens of thousands of dollars.

Even the proposed 20 per cent rate cap represents a........

© The Examiner