menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Judge Shielded SPLC From Scrutiny in Groundbreaking Defamation Case: Appeal

7 0
18.04.2026

Judge Shielded SPLC From Scrutiny in Groundbreaking Defamation Case: Appeal

The Horses Approach the Gate for the 2028 Democrat Primary

State Department Official Gives Strong Message to Families of Iranian Terrorists Living in US

American Immigration Policy Could Learn From Modern Italy, Ancient Rome, and Plato

American Immigration Policy Could Learn From Modern Italy, Ancient Rome, and Plato

EXCLUSIVE: CBP Makes Massive Cocaine Seizure From Bus

Gill Blasts Republicans Who Voted to Keep Protected Status for Haitians

   PoliticsSecuritySocietyNews

‘16 Years Is Not Temporary’: Freedom Caucus Members Want TPS Ended for Haitians

Iran Crumbles, Critics Scramble: Trump’s Long Game Leaves the Media Exposed

 LawPoliticsSocietyNews

Heritage Panel: CCP is Murdering Citizens for Organs and Profiting by the Billions

How China Dominates the World’s Critical Minerals Production

Reclaiming the Lunar High Ground

RFK Jr. Defends HHS Agenda on Capitol Hill, Touts Early Wins and Future Reforms

FISA Spy Powers Vote a Late-Night Trainwreck on House Floor

GOP Veteran Harrigan to Deliver Concealed-Carry Rights to Special Forces

Gill Blasts Republicans Who Voted to Keep Protected Status for Haitians

Virginia Voters Should Look to Democrat-Run Maryland on Redistricting

Ruling Allows Fulton County to Block Republican Election Board Nominees 

Spanberger Is ‘Taking Credit’ for Youngkin’s Economic Deals

Trump’s Election Integrity Order Faces Wave of Lawsuits Before Dem-Appointed Judges

Trump Bullish on Iran Deal, but Uncertainty Remains

Where Do Dem Presidential Favorites Stand on Israel?

 PoliticsSecurityNews

Trump Claims Gold Star Families Told Him to ‘Finish the Job’ in Iran

Citing ‘Echo Chamber’ on Iran, Trump Counterterrorism Chief Resigns

Conservative and Proud: Is the Right Representing Women? 

Girl Boss vs. Trad Wife: Forced to Choose?

Beyond the Oyster Fork: An Etiquette Expert’s Tips for ‘Relationships, Work, and Life’

Is the Iran Operation ‘America First’?

The Implosion of Eric Swalwell: What Was He Thinking?

International Commentary

How Trump Outsmarted Iran While Critics Rooted Against America and the Media Melted Down

Victor Davis Hanson Calls Out MAGA’s New ‘Defectors’

Democrats’ Jungle Primary Boomerang Hits Swalwell Hard

Judge Shielded SPLC From Scrutiny in Groundbreaking Defamation Case: Appeal

Tyler O'Neil / @Tyler2ONeil

Tyler O'Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: "Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center," and "The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government."

A district court judge repeatedly shielded the Southern Poverty Law Center from scrutiny during a defamation case and then dismissed a conservative group’s case because it “lacked evidence,” according to the conservative group’s attorneys.

Attorneys for the estate of Donald A. King and his organization, the Dustin Inman Society, filed an 81-page brief Thursday asking a higher court to reconsider the case. They claimed that Judge Corey L. Maze of the Northern District of Alabama erred in rejecting their attempts to obtain evidence proving the SPLC acted with actual malice in branding the society an “anti-immigrant hate group.”

“The case was decided by stacking four errors,” Harry Mihet, chief litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel and one of DIS’s attorneys, told The Daily Signal in a Friday phone call. “Cutting off discovery, ignoring what the SPLC already knew, twisting the legal standard, and stretching the single-publication rule, until the plaintiffs had no case left.

“And so the case was decided, not because there is no evidence available, but because the court did not allow any evidence to be gathered, to show that the SPLC acted with actual malice.”

“The case is really about a simple principle: you can’t block discovery, and then win because there’s no evidence,” he added.

Critics say the SPLC routinely smears mainstream conservative and Christian groups by placing them on a “hate map” with chapters of the Ku Klux Klan. King, founder of the Dustin Inman Society, sued the center for defamation after it branded his Georgia-based organization—which opposes illegal immigration—an “anti-immigrant hate group.”

The SPLC claims that “The Dustin Inman Society, led by D.A. King, poses as an organization concerned about immigration issues, yet focuses on vilifying all immigrants.” In 2011, the SPLC stated that the society was not a “hate group,” but it reversed course and applied the label in 2018. The society’s board includes legal immigrants, and King’s adopted sister is herself a legal immigrant.

Judge W. Keith Watkins of the Middle District of Alabama allowed the defamation case to move forward in 2023, but Judge Maze later took the case, and rejected the society’s discovery motions.

The society’s lawyers claim that Maze violated precedent when he denied the society’s request for documents related to SPLC’s internal policies for designating “hate groups,” SPLC’s communications about the society, and materials concerning SPLC’s methodology as applied to other groups in the immigration context.

The denial of discovery left behind “a record stripped of the evidence on which defamation plaintiffs depend,” they said, and then the judge “granted summary judgment because that evidence was missing.”

The society also claims Maze erred by finding that the statute of limitations prevented the society from obtaining documents related to the SPLC’s decision to brand the society a “hate group” in 2018 and beforehand.

“The statute of limitations bars stale claims; it does not bar relevant evidence,” the filing states.

The society also faulted the judge for using “wrong legal standards” to analyze the defamation claims.

Maze ruled that the society did not have a defamation claim because the SPLC’s definition of “anti-immigrant” meant animus against illegal immigrants, as well as legal ones. But the society’s lawyers say Maze took the SPLC’s definition on faith, rather than asking how a third-party would view the “anti-immigrant” accusation.

“A defendant’s self-serving testimony that it believed in the truth of its statements ‘cannot, by itself, defeat summary judgment,'” the brief states, citing precedent.

Finally, the judge allegedly shielded the SPLC by finding that the Alabama Supreme Court would view the SPLC’s repeated attack on DIS as a single publication, dating only to a time outside the statute of limitations.

The society’s lawyers noted that the Alabama Supreme Court has never ruled in a situation quite like this one, and the single-publication rule arguably does not apply.

“The ‘no evidence’ conclusion did not reflect any weakness in [the society’s] case,” the brief argues. “It reflected the cumulative force of four rulings that made the case nearly impossible to prove.”

Why Does This Matter?

The SPLC has faced renewed scrutiny after the assassination of Charlie Kirk last year. The SPLC gained its reputation by suing Ku Klux Klan groups into bankruptcy, and it now publishes a “hate map” that includes conservative and Christian groups alongside Klan chapters. The SPLC added Turning Point USA, Kirk’s organization, to the “hate map” in May.

In 2012, a terrorist used the “hate map” to target the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian nonprofit in Washington, D.C.

The SPLC condemned both the Kirk assassination and the attack on FRC, but it has kept both groups on the “hate map.”

Last month, FBI Director Kash Patel announced that the bureau had formally severed all ties with the SPLC, which he called a “partisan smear machine.”

Don Lemon Wants a New Legal Standard: Journalists Are Immune From the Law

A Japanese Lesson for Troubled Britain

Lawyers for Texas Anti-ICE Agitators Try to Discredit Anti-Antifa Witness by Citing Group That Carries Water for Antifa

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  


© The Daily Signal