No, Justice Thomas Hasn’t Damaged the Reputation of the Supreme Court
Watch All Shows Victor Davis Hanson Tony Kinnett Daily Signal Signal Sitdown
Watch All Shows Victor Davis Hanson Tony Kinnett Daily Signal Signal Sitdown
Home – Clarence Thomas News – No, Justice Thomas Hasn’t Damaged the Reputation of the Supreme Court
No, Justice Thomas Hasn’t Damaged the Reputation of the Supreme Court
Juan Williams calls Justice Clarence Thomas‘ place in history tragic. His argument rests on two sweeping claims: that Thomas is at the heart of a historic decline in public trust in the Supreme Court, and that he has damaged trust in black conservatives as a source of ideas about race. Those are serious accusations. They deserve more than confident assertion. They deserve evidence, careful reasoning, and the same respect for individual judgment that Williams should expect for himself.
Thomas is one of the most respected, trusted, and consistent members of the court. His majority opinions and dissents are essential reading because they reveal a justice who takes the Constitution seriously and explains his reasoning with unusual clarity. A reader may disagree with his conclusions. But disagreement does not establish that his service is tragic or that he has betrayed anyone.
Williams’ criticism repeatedly makes Thomas’ race central to the verdict. He describes Thomas as the most powerful black Republican in national politics, then judges his work by what it supposedly means for black conservatives and racial debate. That is racial essentialism, and it is a form of racism. It assumes that a black justice carries a particular obligation to think, vote, or speak in a way that satisfies others. It treats his identity as a political assignment.
Thomas should be judged, as every justice........
