Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

In a bejeweled white pantsuit and towering stiletto pumps, Megyn Kelly tried to work the crowd like a rock star. Pacing the stage at the Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Arizona, on the last night of her fall 2025 tour, she traded her typical sardonicism for high-pitched sincerity. “This is incredible,” she gushed as the audience cheered. “I love you, too. I sincerely love you.”

Kelly looked a little ill at ease to be out from behind the desk where she records her daily political commentary program, The Megyn Kelly Show. One hand holding a microphone, the other arm tightly tucked across her chest, she retreated to her zones of rhetorical comfort: grievance, victimhood, outrage.

“There is no such thing” as transgender people, she said, only people “working out their sex kink on you.” When one audience member asked about American Muslims “outbreeding native Westerners” in order to “supplant our Judeo-Christian civilization,” Kelly readily declared that “Islam is not consistent with fundamental Western values.” The only way to combat the supposed Muslim plot take over the country? “The non-Muslims need to have a lot more babies.” As she revved up the crowd, Kelly’s punditry swerved in the direction of a political rally. Addressing an imaginary throng of liberals celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death, she crowed, “You can’t stop us! There are millions of us!”

It was all standard fare for a right-wing provocateur in 2026. But if you’re old enough to remember the Megyn Kelly of the pre-pandemic years, the spectacle could give you a touch of whiplash.

Less than 10 years ago, Kelly, then a Fox News anchor, was gunning for a career in mainstream media. She called herself “kinda done with politics,” lamenting that there was “so much division” in the country. She wrote a book that held up Hillary Clinton’s presidential nomination as an inspiring moment of progress. She grilled Donald Trump on his pattern of misogynist harassment and suggested that he might be a “sexual predator.” Vanity Fair dubbed her an “improbable feminist icon.”

It’s hard to square that persona with the firebrand whose rage-baiting tirades are now an essential part of the far-right media diet. She once excoriated a presidential candidate for insulting women’s looks; in January, she hosted a segment mocking female protesters of Immigration and Customs Enforcement as “obese and unattractive,” announcing that “I don’t think any of these people are having sex.” She once gave solace to the victims of an alleged sexual abuser in media; last year, she hired him to host his own podcast on her network. The guy who accused her of having “blood coming out of her wherever,” nicknamed her “Crazy Megyn,” and encouraged his supporters to boycott her show? She endorsed him for president at a rally the night before the 2024 election, greeting him with a kiss and praising him as “a protector of women.” At the risk of sounding Pollyannaish: What the hell happened here?

It’s tempting to write Kelly off as an anti-PC crusader who was chased off into the right-wing wilderness for being racist on main one too many times, or as one of the sundry opportunists who’ve held a wet finger to the wind and decided it served them better to embrace Trump than resist him. But there is something darker to Kelly’s arc: Her journey into some of the more extreme and disturbing corners of contemporary conservatism has led to the greatest visibility of her career.

Buoyed by her Trump endorsement, The Megyn Kelly Show has been the third-largest right-wing podcast in the industry for more than a year, with subscriber growth rates that regularly surpass those of her peers in the field. Her first-ever national tour brought out tens of thousands of fans to 10 cities last fall, selling out venues from coast to coast. On YouTube alone, not counting her listeners on podcast platforms, she reported bringing in 138 million views in a single month this winter.

The story of Megyn Kelly isn’t just about a once promising broadcast star who chose radical partisanship over journalism. It’s the story of how two American institutions, the Republican Party and the news industry, have warped and withered over the span of the last decade. Trace Kelly’s transformation, and you’ll see a new social order emerge. In a self-sustaining cycle of rot that bodes nothing positive for American democracy, certain sects of the MAGA movement reward their bards for every step they take down the rabbit hole of bigotry and truth denial. The shape of Kelly’s resurrection holds clues about how much deeper it could go.

It was in August 2015, at the first Republican presidential debate, that Kelly hit the first big inflection point on her journey. As one of the moderators, she opened the event by reminding Trump that he’d called women “fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals,” and told a Celebrity Apprentice contestant that “it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees.”

“Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president?” she asked. “And how will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton … that you are part of the war on women?”

Trump brushed it off in the moment, but he was rattled. The next night, he told CNN that Kelly was probably so mean to him because she was menstruating. On Twitter, he said she was a “lightweight” and retweeted a post that called her a “bimbo.” His supporters sent her death threats; she hired private security. Trump clung to his resentment like a binkie: He even skipped the next Fox News debate because he was so mad at her. The way she tells it in her 2016 memoir, Settle for More, her life was hell for months.

Before her faceoff with Trump, Kelly was known as one of the saner, smarter voices at Fox News—a notable if not breathtaking accomplishment. Sure, she lent credence to all manner of odious far-right views and seemed fixated on the notion that the real racism was against white people. (Mark Fuhrman, the detective from the O.J. Simpson trial who used racist slurs on tape, was a frequent guest on the topic of race and policing.) But she also made her name on what the journalist Jim Rutenberg called “Megyn moments,” in which she’d pick an argument with conservative guests—Tom Tancredo, Dick Cheney—who came on her show expecting a softball interview. And she’d get a ludicrous amount of press whenever she gently taunted chauvinist men, like the ones who called maternity leave a “racket” or grumbled about the rise of female breadwinners. Media critics were taken with the quasi-feminist defiance Kelly could exude, even when she was simply defending the circumstances of her own working-mom life.

So when the Trump incident went down, seeds of a new Megyn Kelly narrative were ready to sprout. The Washington Post published a video celebrating “Megyn Kelly’s long history of asking tough questions.” Hillary Clinton described her as a “superb journalist.” Writing in Slate, now–New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wondered if she was seeing, in Kelly, the “first step in a feminist awakening” among women on the right who were coming to realize they’d thrown in their lot with men who openly despised them.

With the chip on her shoulder she’d been carrying since her rejection from Syracuse University’s journalism school in the ’80s, Kelly must have welcomed the validation. As the 2016........

© Slate