menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Advocate John Roberts v. Chief Justice John Roberts

6 0
01.09.2026

The Volokh Conspiracy

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent

About The Volokh Conspiracy Editorial Independence Who we are Books Volokh Daily Email Archives Search DMCA RSS

Advocate John Roberts v. Chief Justice John Roberts

How do you know what a lawyer really believes when he is always representing a client?

Josh Blackman | 9.1.2026 11:57 PM

One of the greatest challenges with judicial selection is knowing what a lawyer actually believes. How do you know what a lawyer really believes when he is always representing a client?

For sure, lawyers at firms are largely hired guns. They'll take whatever paying client comes through the door. Indeed, whenever a lawyer takes a case, he has plausible deniability: I zealously represented my client, without regard to whether I agreed with the cause. How, then, do you know what a lawyer really believes?

You cannot give any weight to clerkships. Those who seek to clerk on the Supreme Court can often fake their politics to get through the gates--and I'm not talking about so-called counter-clerks. Brass rings are neither red nor blue. Dana........

© Reason.com