Donald Trump

Brian Doherty | 4.29.2025 12:50 PM

Before the 2024 election, I wrote about the perplexing phenomenon of libertarians who enthusiastically supported Donald Trump for president, given his anti-libertarian and authoritarian temperament, his being "fanatically against free trade," and pushing a "short-term promise to assault and kidnap and ship out millions of residents who have harmed no one's life or property, and in doing so destroy huge chunks of America's productive economy, disrupting the lives of the other millions of legal citizens who hire them, work for them, depend on their services, or rent and sell to them."

How Trump's administration has misgoverned in its first 100 days, with his most destructive abuses arising from his rejection of core libertarian principles about trade policy and immigration, the movement of goods and people across arbitrary government barriers, demonstrates why trying to supposedly balance those ferociously anti-libertarian tendencies with his acceptably libertarian ones (a stated commitment to shrinking size and cost of government, through Elon Musk's efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency, have delivered less than promised, are rife with reporting errors, and seem to be aimed not at making government any more sensible or useful so much as scoring institutional points against the administration's perceived leftist enemies) leads to accepting near complete collapse of any meaningful distinctions between the U.S. government and the worst economically interventionist and authoritarian tyrannies.

Trump's rejection of libertarian verities, particularly as set forth in the works of the great classical liberal economist and libertarian movement founding father Ludwig von Mises, has caused severe and likely lasting damage to the U.S. economy and is causing cruelly destructive harm to many humans who have caused no harms that a libertarian should recognize as harms.

As Ludwig von Mises put it in his exposition of his political philosophy, Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition, "The theoretical demonstration of the consequences of the protective tariff and of free trade is the keystone of classical economics. It is so clear, so obvious, so indisputable, that its opponents were unable to advance any arguments against it that could not be immediately refuted as completely mistaken and absurd….The outcome of protectionism is…always a reduction in the productivity of human labor" and thus a reduction in human prosperity.

It's very on-brand for Trump to seem utterly ignorant of this and pursue higher and wider tariffs, for a whipsawing variety of reasons, most of which seem reducible to an ignorant chip on his shoulder, leading him to believe everyone else is ripping him/America off in some ill-defined way by selling and buying goods from us (yes, sometimes through tariff barriers, which are bad for them and us, just as ours are bad for us and them).

Trump's wide-ranging tariff moves, though how they will end up specifically applied moving forward is still uncertain (which is a big part of the problem), are, predictably, crippling small businesses, tanking stock markets, influencing looming supply chain disruptions and goods shortages as imports might fall by as much as 20 percent, and causing even big-business donors to the GOP to note with alarm that Trump's moves may have made America, not closer to Great Again, but "20 percent poorer" with its effect on costs to American consumers and businesses. And no, there's no countervailing bright side in sight (unless Trump just backs down on the whole thing and declares victory after getting some tariffs of other countries lowered somewhere).

Bad policies have bad aftereffects; his moves predictably generated announcements of planned tit-for-tat moves from

© Reason.com