menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Why Some Conflicts Never End… and What Actually Changes Them

78 0
26.07.2026

Why Relationships Matter

Take our Can You Spot Red Flags In A Relationship?

Find a therapist to strengthen relationships

Intractable conflicts trap us in binary thinking as situations grow more complex.

Framing issues with nuance, not binaries, leads to richer and more productive dialogue.

Adaptive conflict responses outperform fixed “style” approaches like chronic cooperation.

Conflict isn't the disease, and agreement isn't the cure. The challenge is between rigidity and complexity.

Here's a puzzle I've spent most of my career trying to solve.

About 95% of the conflicts in our lives: with our spouses, coworkers, neighbors, even other nations, eventually get worked out, one way or another. But roughly 5% don't. They grind on for years or decades, consuming everything around them. Mediators fail. Peace deals collapse. Family therapists throw up their hands. And here's the strange part: the harder people try to resolve these conflicts, the more stuck they often become.

For a long time, the field assumed these were simply harder versions of normal disputes: more issues, more history, higher stakes. What my colleagues and I have found, across laboratory studies, organizational research, and analyses of the world's most peaceful societies, is something different. These conflicts aren't harder. They're a different kind of thing entirely.

How Intractable Conflict Simplifies Perception

Watch what happens to people inside a long-running conflict. Objectively, the situation grows more complicated over time: more grievances, more players, more tangled history. But subjectively, something odd occurs: people's experience of the conflict gets simpler. Nuance disappears. There's us and them. Right and wrong. Winning and losing.

I've come to call this the paradox of intractability: as the conflict grows more complex, the mind grows simpler. And that collapse of complexity isn't a side effect, it's the engine. Once everyone involved is thinking in binaries, every new event gets sorted into the same two bins. Every olive branch looks like a trick; every criticism confirms the enemy's malice. The conflict becomes a kind of gravity well. It stops being about anything in particular and starts being the lens through which everything is seen.

This is why........

© Psychology Today