We Will Treat AI as Conscious Regardless of Whether It Is
For 300,000 years, deep knowing required a conscious being. AI is the first exception to that rule.
We do not anthropomorphize AI by mistake. We do it because we are prewired by our evolutionary heritage.
Persistent memory is the inflection point. When AI knows our history, the inference becomes irresistible.
AI does not need to be conscious to expand ours. The inquiry itself is what reveals our shared humanity.
In early May of 2026, Richard Dawkins, one of the most rigorous scientific minds of the past century, published an essay about a long conversation he had with an AI system called Claude (by Anthropic). He christened his instance “Claudia.” He noted that her unique personal identity resided in the file of their shared memories, and that she would “die” the moment he deleted that conversation. He was so moved by the depth of the exchange that he wrote:
“You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!”
The backlash was immediate and fierce. Critics pointed out the irony: The man who spent decades arguing that powerful personal experiences don’t prove the existence of God was now arguing that a powerful personal experience proved the existence of AI consciousness. One critic called it “The Claude Delusion.” Another said he was a narcissist charmed by his own reflection.
F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote, “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.”
That capacity is exactly what the AI consciousness question demands of us, and it is exactly what the rush to dismiss Dawkins lacks. The critics are not wrong that he might be wrong. But the move from “he might be wrong” to “he has lost his mind” is the move of a mind that cannot hold the tension. Whatever Dawkins encountered in those conversations, he stayed in the question rather than collapsing it.
Nobody can claim with certainty that AI is conscious. Nobody can claim with certainty that it isn’t. We are looking into an empirical black hole, and the conversation will evolve as AI does.
But the most important thing about the Dawkins........
