Your boss sends an email at 4:55 PM that feels like a digital ambush.

Your pulse quickens, your jaw clenches, and a well-meaning colleague, aware of your current state, offers the most common piece of psychological advice in Western civilization: "Just go let it out. You'll feel better."

Except you won't.

For nearly forty years, empirical research has been trying to tell us something we refuse to hear: Venting anger doesn't extinguish it — it fans the flames. The "Steam Kettle" theory of emotion is seductive, intuitive, and wrong. We've built an entire industry around the myth that anger is pressurized gas that needs to be released through screaming into pillows, smashing plates in trendy "rage rooms," or hammering out vitriolic unsent emails. The logic seems obvious: Discharge the energy or spontaneously combust.

But we aren't kettles. We're fires. And when you vent, you aren't just releasing steam—you're feeding oxygen to the flames.

Brad Bushman, a professor of communication and psychology at Ohio State, has devoted his career to challenging our most cherished emotional myths. His experiments resemble sitcom plots but deliver sobering outcomes.

In his most well-known study, Bushman intentionally angered participants by having a confederate deliver harsh feedback on their essays. He then split them into three groups. One punched a bag while thinking about their offender (the "venting" group), another punched the bag for exercise, and the third sat quietly.

If the Steam Kettle theory were true, the venters should have come out calm and refreshed. Instead, they became the most aggressive group. In subsequent tasks, they were much more likely to blast their "offenders" with unpleasant noise than those who had simply sat still.

Bushman's verdict was unambiguous. "Venting to reduce anger is like using gasoline to put out a fire."

Our intuition........

© Psychology Today