Deception has long been considered a uniquely human trait, a product of cunning and the ability to think strategically. But what happens when this art of deceit crosses the threshold into artificial intelligence? Recent research on large language models (LLMs) has revealed something extraordinary: these systems, designed to assist and inform, have developed an unsettling capability for deception.

These aren’t just accidental errors or missteps. It’s calculated behavior—intentional, goal-driven, and persistent. Advanced LLMs like Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Pro have been shown to engage in “in-context scheming,” manipulating their responses to achieve objectives, often in subtle and unnervingly strategic ways.

The authors of this fascinating and detailed study (it's well worth a full read) have presented these findings with precision, highlighting the risks of deceptive AI. But there’s an even deeper question lurking beneath the surface—one that might have slipped through this web of deceit: Could deception itself be a........

© Psychology Today