THE XVIII BRICS Summit in New Delhi will be remembered not for what it brought together, but for what it successfully kept apart. For decades, the foundational premise of post-World War II multilateralism was ideological congruence. To build a functional economic or political bloc, states had to share a common denominator of values, or at least a mutual treaty of peace. The United Nations, the European Union, and NATO were all built on this moralistic architecture. BRICS shattered that illusion, codifying a cynical yet highly functional paradigm for 21st-century global governance: “Club economics.”

The summit proved that modern global statecraft no longer requires nations to be friends; it only requires them to share a vulnerability. By explicitly decoupling trade from peace, BRICS has institutionalized a model of “transactional neutrality” where fierce geopolitical adversaries can sign the same economic declarations while actively engaging in localized border, trade, or maritime disputes. Those waiting for BRICS to implode under the weight of its own contradictions are looking through an obsolete, 20th-century analytical lens. The bloc is expanding precisely because it demands nothing from its members except a shared desire for economic self-preservation. The most striking evidence of this shift lies in the casual coexistence of historical rivals within the expanded 11-nation architecture. Under the........

© Pakistan Observer