Opinion | Tariffs As Leverage: Why Washington’s New Trade Pressure On India Signals A Tougher Negotiating Era
Opinion | Tariffs As Leverage: Why Washington’s New Trade Pressure On India Signals A Tougher Negotiating Era
The proposed additional US tariffs are less about trade deficits and more about strategic bargaining power, forcing India to navigate a complex economic and geopolitical landscape
The latest proposal by the United States to impose additional tariffs on imports from several countries, including India, has once again exposed the increasingly transactional nature of global trade politics. While Washington has justified the move through a Section 301 investigation into alleged unfair trade practices, the timing and context suggest that the tariff threat is not merely an economic measure. Instead, it appears to be a calculated negotiating tactic designed to extract concessions from trading partners, particularly India, at a critical stage of bilateral trade discussions.
For India, the proposed 12.5 per cent tariff on certain exports is more than a trade irritant. It is a reminder that despite the growing strategic partnership between New Delhi and Washington, economic relations continue to be shaped by hard-nosed national interests rather than diplomatic goodwill.
Trump-Netanyahu Rift Deepens? US Officials Carry Burner Phones In Israel Amid Spying Fears
Why Trump Cut Tariffs On Farm, Industrial Equipment From 25% To 15% And What It Means For India
Veteran Cardiologist Says Trump's Health Report Raises More Questions Than Answers
The Billion-Dollar Hurdle In US-Iran Talks: Why Tehran’s Cash Demand Puts Trump In A Political Bind
The Trump administration’s trade philosophy has always been rooted in the belief that tariffs are effective instruments of leverage. During his first term, President Donald Trump frequently used tariffs as bargaining tools against allies and adversaries alike. Whether targeting China, Mexico, Canada, or the European Union, the objective was not always to sustain tariffs permanently but to create pressure that would compel counterparts to negotiate on terms more favourable to the........
