menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Why Ketanji Brown Jackson is hell-bent on destroying the Supreme Court

29 0
08.05.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Business Personal Finance

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Why Ketanji Brown Jackson is hell-bent on destroying the Supreme Court

The call is coming from inside the house. 

The Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais has made progressives even more determined to delegitimize the court — and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is among them. 

In a dissent involving a post-decision procedural question, Jackson accused the majority of acting out of pure partisanship.

Her opinion said that the court “unshackles itself” from all constraint and “dives into the fray” (meaning the partisan fray).

In its jurisprudence, “principles give way to power.”

It is acting with an “abandon” that is “unwarranted and unwise.”

The week in whoppers: Elizabeth Warren rips into Jeff Bezos, Reuters gaslights on Voting Rights Act and more

As furious redistricting battles continue, we reveal Republican plan to add 14 seats following last week’s Supreme Court ruling

Apple dealt blow by Supreme Court in long-running antitrust feud against ‘Fortnite’ maker

These harsh charges occasioned a stinging and well-deserved rebuttal from Justice Samuel Alito.

But, merits aside, the tenor and substance of the Jackson dissent captures the mindset of a left that is increasingly determined to destroy the Supreme Court in order to save it. 

The technical matter under dispute was whether the court would wait 32 days to finalize its decision in Louisiana v.........

© New York Post