Yuan Yi Zhu: Fire any Supreme Court judge that tries to put limits on Section 33
Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Yuan Yi Zhu: Fire any Supreme Court judge that tries to put limits on Section 33
The constitution must not be changed without democratic consent
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
In a normal country, ideas about the ideal arrangements for society’s well-functioning are debated by the public and voted upon by either elected legislators or, in some cases, through direct democracy. But Canada isn’t a normal country.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the challenge against Quebec’s secularism law, which imposes all manners of restrictions on the public practice of religion in the name of secularism. For good measure, the legislature insulated it from constitutional challenge by invoking the notwithstanding clause.
Yuan Yi Zhu: Fire any Supreme Court judge that tries to put limits on Section 33 Back to video
Both the bill’s substance (with a few small exceptions) as well as Quebec’s invocation of Section 33 were upheld in the Quebec Court of Appeal. But critics of the law, supported by the federal government and numerous NGOs, have taken the case to the Supreme Court. They hope not only to strike down the law, but to introduce limits on the invocation of Section 33, a longstanding goal of a segment of the Laurentian elite (think........
