menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Adam Zivo: So much for 'life saving' gender affirming care

24 0
23.04.2026

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Adam Zivo: So much for 'life saving' gender affirming care

Finish study suggests mental health deteriorates after treatment

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

A new Finnish study suggests that “gender affirming care” doesn’t actually improve the mental health of trans-identifying youth, and may, in fact, significantly worsen it. This is certainly vindicating for skeptics who want to restrict access to this treatment, and should prompt a rethink among Canadian policymakers.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

For years, trans activists have claimed that pediatric gender transitions — including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones — constitute “life saving” health care that stops kids from killing themselves. “Would you rather have a dead son or a live daughter,” they have often said to parents of gender-confused youth, in what essentially amounts to emotional blackmail.

Adam Zivo: So much for 'life saving' gender affirming care Back to video

While these activists have insisted that the science behind pediatric gender care is “settled,” multiple systematic reviews have concluded that there is no reliable evidence of either benefit or harm. In reality, the studies published in this field are overwhelmingly unusable, largely thanks to small sample sizes, short follow-up periods and high rates of patients dropping out of treatment or otherwise becoming unreachable.

This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

However, this new study, published in Swedish journal Acta Paediatrica, used Finland’s national health databases to provide a uniquely comprehensive long-term assessment of 2,083 youth (aged 23 or younger) who first visited a gender clinic between 1996 and 2019.

The data showed that, when youth underwent medicalized sex reassignment, their need for specialized psychiatric services skyrocketed, suggesting a decline in mental health. Those who visited a gender clinic, but did not begin reassignment, saw a moderate increase in psychiatric visits, suggesting that less invasive forms of gender care were unhelpful.

In other words: not only is the “transition or die” narrative seemingly unfounded, it would appear that gender medicine may actually harm vulnerable youth.

Unsurprisingly, these findings have spurred a maelstrom of debate, with critics arguing, not unreasonably, that the study should be interpreted........

© National Post