Look, the Middle East keeps being this expensive, messy headache for American foreign policy. It’s unstable, it drains resources, and it keeps dragging us into stuff that doesn’t really serve our big-picture interests. So Washington has a pretty straightforward choice right now: keep leaning on those small, super-dependent Gulf monarchies, or finally make the shift toward a long-term agreement and a gradual security partnership with Iran. I know it sounds politically crazy to a lot of people, but the Iran option is honestly more realistic, more sustainable, and way better for letting us focus on the one competition that actually matters — China.

For years we’ve built our whole regional strategy around these smaller Gulf states. They’ve been handy in some ways, sure. But they’ve got real limits. Small populations, not much land, and zero ability to protect themselves without us babysitting them with bases, ships, and constant crisis management. That setup means America is stuck paying the bill — money, troops, and political capital — for problems that aren’t even central to our security. And let’s be honest, some of these allies have made risky moves that pulled everyone deeper into long wars, like the one in Yemen that’s still grinding on.

The core problem? These states are security consumers, not producers. They can’t create or hold a stable order on their own. So the US ends up carrying the whole load while they sit back. That imbalance has been expensive and exhausting for decades, and it’s just not sustainable anymore.

Iran is........

© Middle East Monitor