By: Ahmad Ayaz

The recent amendments to the Waqf Bill have stirred up considerable public discourse across India. These changes, presented by the government as reforms, touch upon deeply rooted issues of governance, religious autonomy, and land management. While the government claims the amendments are intended to ensure better utilization of Waqf properties for the upliftment of Muslims, critics argue that these changes might have far-reaching implications, including communal tensions and a curtailing of minority rights. This article explores both the rationale provided by the government and the possible effects of the amendments.

RATIONALE BEHIND THE AMENDMENTS

The government has advanced several justifications for amending the Waqf laws. The three most prominent are:

For decades, Waqf boards across India have faced accusations of rampant corruption. With thousands of acres of Waqf land and properties under their control, allegations of illegal sales, encroachments, and misappropriation have been common. Government officials argue that these amendments are crucial to introducing accountability and transparency in the management of Waqf assets.

By strengthening audit mechanisms, increasing state oversight, and mandating record-keeping, the government claims that corrupt practices can be curtailed. Proponents believe that public interest will be better served when there is stringent supervision over how religious endowments are administered.

Another major justification for the amendments is the chronic mismanagement and underutilization of Waqf properties. A significant portion of these assets remains either encroached upon or idle, generating little revenue or community benefit.

The reforms seek to introduce professional administrative standards, digitization of records, and efficient use of resources to........

© Kashmir Images