By Shailesh Haribhakti and Ajay Goel

The king shall consider as good, not what pleases himself, but what pleases his subjects.” — Kautilya’s Arthashastra. Corporate governance has produced an entire architecture of codes, committees, and compliance calendars — the G20/OECD Principles, the UK Corporate Governance Code, Sarbanes-Oxley, India’s Companies Act and SEBI’s LODR. All of it matters. None of it is sufficient. Rules constrain bad behaviour; they do not manufacture good judgment. That must come from the boardroom itself.

The board is not one input into governance among many. It is the governance system. Everything else — disclosure norms, audit standards, committee charters — exists to give the board the information and independence to do one job well: Decide, in real time, before the damage is done.

Most boards still don’t do this. They review. They ratify. They arrive at a meeting with a thick deck, ask a few sharpened questions, and approve what management has already decided. That is oversight in name, not substance. The shift that matters — the one every code gestures at but few boards execute — is from reviewer to steward: From........

© Indian Express