One year after the Pahalgam attack, it is evident that what unfolded on April 22, 2025, was not an isolated act of terror — it was a strategic inflection point. The attack targeted not just civilians but the very idea of normalcy in Kashmir. It struck at the narrative of recovery, coexistence, and reintegration that had slowly begun to take shape. The killing of tourists — targeted explicitly for their faith in the Basiran meadow — continues to haunt the image of Kashmir as a safe destination. No invocation of Kashmiriyat or curated mehman nawazi (acts of hospitality) can easily repair the profound deficit of trust created by those traumatic events.

One year on, therefore, the question is what has changed. How has the Pahalgam terror strike reshaped India’s policies? What does it tell us about the limits of our strategic imagination?

The three elements that stand out are: Deterrence, bilateralism, and the changing vectors of India’s external relations.

Operation Sindoor and India’s wider response to Pahalgam have reset the baseline of its counter-terrorism doctrine. Unlike the episodic and reactive responses of the past, Sindoor was targeted, persistent, and multi-pronged. The objective was not simply to exact retribution but to change the cost-benefit calculus of terrorism in Kashmir. With surgical strikes aimed at terrorist launchpads on the Pakistan side of the Line of Control, Sindoor expanded the domain of deterrence to impose costs both within Pakistan and among the wider ecosystem of enablers and sustenance. Measured narrowly, this recalibration has delivered results. For over a year now, there have been no large-scale, spectacular attacks in Kashmir of the kind that........

© hindustantimes