menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

When trust collapses inside the classroom

21 0
18.04.2026

The bell had rung, but no one moved.

Chairs remained aligned, notebooks open, eyes directed - at least outwardly - towards the front. The choreography of the classroom held its shape, as it always does. There is a peculiar discipline to such spaces, one that does not require constant enforcement because it has already been internalised. Students learn early how to sit, when to speak, when to fall silent. They learn that attention is not just a cognitive act but a performance- something that must be displayed, measured, and, at times, feigned.

In the second row, a girl sat with her pen resting lightly against the page. The ink had not moved for several minutes, though the lecture continued uninterrupted. Her stillness was not distraction; it was deliberation. A quiet calculation, the kind that leaves no visible trace but consumes the mind entirely. What does one do when the space that demands attention begins to produce unease? When the very figure who embodies authority becomes difficult to look at, not out of defiance, but out of a discomfort that resists easy naming?

Nothing in the architecture of the classroom acknowledges this possibility.

The classroom, as it is imagined, does not accommodate ambiguity of this kind. It is supposed to be a space of clarity- of questions and answers, of right and wrong, of instruction and understanding. It has no language for discomfort that is neither dramatic nor easily demonstrable. And so, when such discomfort arises, it does not find expression in the formal structures of the institution. It retreats inward. It becomes hesitation, avoidance, a slight adjustment of posture, a preference for the back bench, a decision to remain unnoticed.

The girl has learned these adjustments well. Not because she was taught them explicitly, but because they form part of a larger, unspoken curriculum- one that precedes the classroom and extends beyond it. She has learned that visibility can be a risk, that speaking can invite scrutiny, that questioning authority is not a neutral act. She has learned, in ways both subtle and direct, that safety often lies in minimising oneself- taking up less space, drawing less attention, offering less resistance.

And institutions, despite their claims of neutrality, quietly depend on this minimisation.

It is what........

© Greater Kashmir