On 6 June, as Operation Blue Star completes 42 years, the date returns for Sikhs across the world. It was not merely a military operation; it was a shattering of trust, a violation of sacred space, and a moment when the relationship between the state and a community entered a long season of suspicion and pain.

Democracies are meant to solve crises through dialogue, patience, constitutional balance, and moral legitimacy. When force enters the most sacred places of a community, the state may claim tactical necessity, but it often loses something far more valuable: legitimacy in the eyes of those it is supposed to protect. That is exactly why Operation Blue Star still matters. Its consequences were never confined to June 1984. Its shadow fell across the anti-Sikh violence that followed. The psyche of Sikh families, and the wider understanding of how fragile trust can be when power is used without sensitivity.What remains today is a persistent question. Has the country fully understood the damage done? Has it faced the moral burden of what happened? Has it created enough space for truth, accountability, and healing? For many Sikhs, the answer remains incomplete. And yet, what is equally remarkable is what Operation Blue Star did not destroy.

It did not extinguish the Sikh sense of dignity. It did not erase the faith’s deep commitment to justice, courage, and service. It did not turn a community built on resilience into one that would surrender its ideals to bitterness. If anything, the Sikh response to that era has often shown the opposite: a refusal to let trauma become hatred, a determination to remain anchored in values larger than revenge.This is an important truth that often gets ignored in public discussion. The strongest expression of Sikh patriotism has never depended on applause from the state. It has come from conduct from service in the armed forces, from honest labour, from feeding the hungry through langar, from standing for the weak, and from carrying one’s identity with fearlessness. A Sikh community that has been hurt deeply can still remain deeply committed to the idea of a plural, constitutional India, provided that India treats it with........

© Greater Kashmir