India’s debate on decolonisation needs a test more demanding than the replacement of names, symbols or syllabi. Does a proposed change give citizens greater freedom to learn, question and shape their lives? Political independence transferred the authority to govern. The unfinished task is to make that authority answerable to people and to widen the knowledge on which public decisions rest.

The World Decolonization Forum, held in Istanbul on May 11–12, 2026, examined the production and circulation of knowledge. Its concerns resonate in India, where the end of empire did not erase inherited hierarchies of language, education and authority. But the debate must move beyond identifying colonial legacies. It must explain which institutions need changing, whose exclusion those changes address and how citizens will benefit.Without that discipline, decolonisation can become an elastic label for every injustice or a defence of anything described as indigenous. Both uses weaken its value. A society cannot achieve intellectual freedom by treating the geographical origin of an idea as proof of its worth. India’s task is to enlarge its choices while retaining the freedom to judge them.

Education is an immediate starting point. Students should encounter Kant and Weber alongside Ambedkar and thinkers from African, Islamic and other intellectual traditions. Such encounters matter because different traditions illuminate different questions about power, justice and social life. The aim should be to equip students to compare arguments, examine evidence and recognise the limits of any single account.Adding names to reading lists will accomplish little unless the conditions of scholarship change. Serious investment in translation, research in Indian languages and access to neglected archives is essential.........

© Greater Kashmir