The market visits and the boardroom: Why India's best FMCG leaders do not separa
New Delhi [India], April 27: India has a way of humbling global ambition. Not because the market is unwelcoming, but because it is uncompromising. It will not bend to frameworks built elsewhere. It will not reward brands that arrive with unearned certainty. And it will not forgive leaders who manage it from a distance.
Establishing a global consumer brand here for the last couple of years, the single most important lesson it has taught me is this: in India, the quality of your strategy is inseparable from the quality of your ground-level understanding. You cannot have one without the other. The moment you begin to believe you can, the market corrects you (usually at a significant cost).
This is what I mean when I say that India's best FMCG leaders do not choose between the boardroom and the factory floor/Markets. They operate in both, simultaneously, because the two are not separate functions.
Why corporate altitude is a business liability here
In more mature, more homogeneous markets, a leader can reasonably operate from a distance. This may work when distribution infrastructure is predictable, or when consumer behaviour follows documented patterns. The distance between a decision and its execution becomes manageable.
As cliches as it may sound , India is “Many Indias “. The same brand can perform entirely differently across two cities in the same state. A retailer will tell you something about consumer demand that contradicts everything your data said a quarter back. A production decision made in a meeting room will create a ripple on the shop floor that no one anticipated, and that ripple will reach the consumer before your next review cycle does.
This is not complexity to be managed around. It is........
