China’s Ethnic Unity and Progress Law marks a deliberate shift in how Beijing frames minority cultural identity, recasting language, religion, and tradition not as protected rights but as potential threats to national unity and social stability. 

This securitised framing provides the legal and rhetorical foundation for continued, and likely intensified, state intervention into the lives of Tibetan, Uyghur, and Mongolian communities.

The pattern is not new, but the new law formalises it. Beijing has, for years, used the language of “anti-separatism,” “de-extremification,” and “social harmony” to justify mass surveillance, internment camps, and restrictions on religious practice in Xinjiang, as well as similar controls in Tibet and Inner Mongolia. 

What were previously presented as emergency or exceptional security measures are now being absorbed into permanent legal structures through this law, even as the formal architecture of ethnic autonomy, the designated regions and........

© Eurasia Review