The author reads “Trump 2.0” and a Monroe-style hemispheric turn—plus Carney’s “rupture” and Buzan’s leadership vacuum—as pressure on India to act as South Asia’s hegemon. Operation Sindoor is cast as the proof: a strike meant to show Pakistan that sovereignty and “nuclear blackmail” will not block an Indian reply. Modi at SRCC: forces will enter Pakistani territory after terror attacks; J&K-to-Northeast peace and a weaker Maoist/Naxal threat are claimed.

Pakistan’s China tie is the counter. The 2025 fighting used J-10Cs; Bloomberg says Islamabad may buy China’s HQ-17A (CASIC; IISS: PLA ~200 HQ-17 and ~50 HQ-17A). After Sindoor, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan signed an 7 August 2026 joint defense pact. Intelligence cited here: Chinese Y-20s and Turkish C-130s into Nur Khan and Masroor with drones and matériel in a tight window.

The author analogizes Sindoor to U.S. raids that ignored sovereignty (Abbottabad 2011; a January 2026 Venezuela operation). India’s job, in this view, is both regional dominance and a “democratic wall” against China. The open question is how far New Delhi will push that role.

Global politics is once again at a crossroads. The “Trump 2.0” era has unsettled the international stage, with Washington appearing to shift toward a hemispheric focus reminiscent of the old Monroe Doctrine. On its anniversary, President Trump declared: “My Administration proudly reaffirms this promise under a new Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine: that the American people—not foreign nations nor globalist institutions—will always control their own destiny in our hemisphere.”

This trend exemplifies a world adrift, marked by what Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney described as: “We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.” It is a moment of fracture that, in the........

© Eurasia Review