The Indian mainstream media has increasingly framed youth-led protest in South Asia through a securitised lens, as seen in the cases of Nepal’s 2025 Gen Z uprising and agitation in Ladakh. Dissent, in both cases, was portrayed less as a democratic claim and more as a problem of instability, disruption and strategic risk. By contrast, international media situated both movements within a broader regional wave of generational mobilisation against shrinking civic space. The article argues that this divergence reflects a growing alignment between Indian mainstream media and state-centric notions of security, with significant consequences for how democratic dissent is publicly understood.

In September 2025, Nepal’s youth-led protests against the government’s sweeping social media ban triggered one of the most intense episodes of political mobilisation the country has seen in decades (Yadav et al 2025; Harvey 2025). Within weeks, a similar generational ferment surfaced in India’s Ladakh region, where young activists joined veteran leaders to demand statehood, constitutional safeguards and environmental protections (Tiwary 2025; Mukul 2025; Ellis-Petersen 2025). These two movements were different in their immediate causes, political contexts and organisational structures. Yet, the way they were covered by India’s mainstream media revealed a strikingly similar interpretive pattern: youth-led dissent was not primarily treated as a democratic claim, but as a security and stability problem.

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

To gain instant access to this article (download).

(Readers outside India)

© EPW