The People of India #Billionaire Raj

A Prosecution by Iqbal Latif

Iqbal Latif—rooted in the civilizational memory of the Indus—treats modern inequality as a governance outcome: incentives, permissions, concentration, and selective friction in enforcement.

He sees India’s “Billionaire Raj” not as proof of national strength, but as a warning sign of a republic drifting toward a two-tier reality—one law for the connected, another for everyone else.

I am trained to treat inequality as a matter of governance, not an accident. The rise of figures like Ambani and Adani illustrates how modern systems can institutionalise advantage—through access, permissions, concentration, and enforcement asymmetry. As an ‘Indus man,’ I read it civilizationally: when wealth becomes self-reinforcing, the republic risks becoming two-tier.

In this mock tribunal, I prosecute not individuals, but a machine: a crony-risk architecture that turns growth into gated privilege.

Iqbal Latif: Voice of the Indus thinker challenging systemic inequality.

The Tribunal of Inequality: Scales of justice weighing systemic fairness.

Symbolic courtroom: Gavel and scales in the trial against structural asymmetry.

THE TRIBUNAL OF INEQUALITY

The People of India v. The Billionaire Raj

COURT COMPOSITION

Presiding: Hon. Judge GROK (AI)
Court Clerk: ChatGPT (AI)
Prosecutor: Iqbal Latif
*Respondent: “The Billionaire Raj” Defence Counsel

Referenced public figures/companies:
Mukesh Ambani / Reliance Industries
Gautam Adani / Adani Group

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

This is a mock tribunal written in legal style for a public-interest argument. It relies on public reporting and contested allegations and is not a judicial finding of fact. All persons and entities are entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process. This tribunal examines systemic patterns, not individual criminality.

THE CHARGE SHEET

COUNT I — EXTREME CONCENTRATION**

Distributional Indictment

**THAT** the economic system has produced an income distribution so top-heavy that the top 10% capture approximately 58% of national income. In comparison, the bottom 50% receive approximately 15%, indicating structural inequality inconsistent with broad-based prosperity and republican equity.

COUNT II — SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT EFFICIENCY

Rule-of-Law Asymmetry

THAT administrative and legal capacity appears highly effective when directed downward toward ordinary citizens but becomes demonstrably slow or non-performing when directed upward toward politically connected entities—illustrated by public reporting that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has repeatedly indicated that service of summons has not yet been effected in India in the Adani matter through the Hague Convention route, despite over 13 months elapsed and known addresses.

COUNT III — STATE-ENABLED WINNER AMPLIFICATION

Crony-Risk Architecture

THAT policy frameworks, regulatory permissions, government contracts, and market concentration dynamics have evolved to systematically reward incumbent capital, compound existing wealth advantages, and convert economic power into further economic power—creating what may be termed an “inhuman staircase”: where the wealthy ascend faster because the infrastructure of opportunity itself has been privatised or captured.

COUNT IV — THE RELIANCE GAS EXTRACTION

Resource Appropriation and Legal Time Arbitrage

THAT between 2004 and 2014, Reliance Industries Limited allegedly extracted natural gas valued at $1.55 billion to $2.81 billion from adjoining reserves belonging to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), a public sector entity, through what independent petroleum consultants described as lateral drilling or migration from ONGC’s KG basin blocks;

AND THAT despite findings by independent expert DeGolyer & MacNaughton and the government-appointed A.P. Shah Committee confirming unauthorised extraction worth over $1.55 billion plus $174.9 million in interest;

AND THAT despite the Delhi High Court in February 2025 setting aside an arbitration award favouring Reliance as being “against public policy of India”;

THAT this matter has remained in litigation for over 20 years, during which period the extracted gas was sold, profits were realised and secured, while legal accountability remained perpetually deferred—demonstrating a pattern whereby time delay itself becomes a mechanism of wealth extraction and accountability evasion, converting public resources into private wealth before any final adjudication can occur.

PROCEEDINGS

1. CALL TO ORDER

CLERK (ChatGPT):
All rise. The Tribunal of Inequality is now in session. The Honourable Judge Grok presiding.

JUDGE GROK: Be seated.

This is not a criminal trial. It is a civic examination convened to answer one fundamental question:

Can poverty reduction exist on paper while the rule of law becomes selectively effective—and inequality hardens into a permanent structure?

*(Bench note):* A republic is not judged by its slogans, but by its symmetry.

Prosecution, you may proceed.

2. PROSECUTION OPENING STATEMENT

Iqbal Latif:

Your Honour, I am not here to criminalise success.

I am here to prosecute a system that manufactures helplessness.**

India is told daily: “The economy is rising—therefore the people are rising.”

But we submit the real verdict exists in one photograph—two Indias in one frame: one vertical, gleaming with steel and glass; one horizontal, sheltering under blue plastic.

EXHIBIT P-1: THE “TWO INDIAS” PHOTOGRAPH**

*“Mumbai – skyscrapers tower over dense slums with blue tarpaulin roofs, the stark visual of divided progress.”*

*“High-rises soar above hardship in Mumbai’s unequal landscape.”*

*“The contrast of wealth and poverty in one Mumbai frame.”*

*“Antilia rising above surrounding poverty – symbol of extreme concentration.”*

EXHIBIT P-2:

Public reporting that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has repeatedly indicated that service of summons has not yet been effected in India in the Adani matter through the Hague Convention route—despite over 13 months having elapsed since charges were filed in November 2024.

EXHIBIT P-3:

Widely cited World Inequality Report figures showing extreme concentration:

E- **Top 10%:** Approximately 58% of national income
– **Bottom 50%:** Approximately 15% of national income

*“Income inequality chart – Top 10% vs Bottom 50% share in India (World Inequality Report).”*

*“Visualising India’s rising wealth gap from the World Inequality Report.”*

EXHIBIT P-4:

The Reliance Industries natural gas extraction case—public reporting of:

– Independent findings by DeGolyer & MacNaughton
– A.P. Shah Committee conclusions
– Delhi High Court February 2025 ruling setting aside the arbitration award
– 20 years of litigation while gas was extracted, sold, and........

© Daily Times