How Islamabad Just Side-Stepped Decades of Failed Middle East Policy
CounterPunch Exclusives
CounterPunch Exclusives
How Islamabad Just Side-Stepped Decades of Failed Middle East Policy
Photograph Source: Fassifarooq – CC BY-SA 4.0
The recent announcement of a two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran has been met with a predictable mix of relief and skepticism. President Trump has framed the pause as a definitive military victory, stating earlier today that “we are witnessing the triumph of American strength over chaos, and the world is finally coming to its senses.” Tehran, meanwhile, has presented its 10-point peace plan as a set of non-negotiable conditions for a sovereign power. Yet the most striking development of the last 12 hours is not found in the rhetoric from Washington or the demands from the Revolutionary Guards. It is found in the location of the upcoming talks: Islamabad.
For decades, the architecture of global diplomacy has rested on a Western foundation. When crises erupted in the Persian Gulf, the world looked to the traditional powers of London, Paris, and Berlin, or perhaps the corridors of the United Nations in New York, to provide the mediating spark. That era appears to have ended. The Islamabad Accord, as the framework is being called, was not crafted by European diplomats or career officials at the State Department. It was brokered through an intense, overnight shuttle diplomacy involving Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir, with the quiet but unmistakable backing of Beijing.
This is a pivot that demands a clear-eyed assessment of the new reality. This is the birth of a post-Western diplomatic order, where the primary mediators of global conflict are no longer the traditional guardians of the liberal........
