You control the outcome of the midterms.

J.B. Shurk | October 19, 2026

People often ask what they can do to support President Trump’s anti-globalist, pro-American agenda.  The most immediate answer is obvious: Vote in the coming midterms and make sure that a dozen of your friends do, as well.  

It’s so easy to let victories slip away due to apathy.  Midterm elections tend to favor political parties out of power because their voters are more desperate for success.  But that does not have to be the case this year.  

Although propaganda news networks continue to pretend that the Democrat Party will win every contest in a few weeks, polling data show Republican enthusiasm equal to or exceeding that of Democrats.  Enthusiastic voters win elections, so do not be surprised when polling predictions favoring Democrats this year turn out to be just as wrong as they have been in every election cycle since President Trump entered politics.  

Do you remember veteran pollster Ann Selzer’s final Iowa poll before the 2024 election?  In a state that Trump had carried by ten points in 2016 and 2020, Selzer had Kamala Harris beating him by three points.  Every cable news talking head called Selzer’s Des Moines Register survey the “gold standard” of polling.  Selzer and her “golden” poll were spectacularly wrong.  The president won Iowa by thirteen points in 2024, the largest margin of victory since President Nixon won 61% of the so-called “popular vote” and 520 electoral votes to Democrat George McGovern’s 37% support and 17 electoral votes in 1972.  In other words, President Trump’s 2024 victory in Iowa was equivalent to President Nixon’s 1972 electoral landslide, and the so-called “Queen of Polling” erred by sixteen points!  Such an error would be statistically impossible for any honest pollster to make.

Polling fraud Selzer was far from the only pollster pushing crap numbers in 2024, and many of those same pollsters have been consistently wrong in their predictions every election cycle of the last couple decades.  The polling industry appears to make money, not by proving to be correct, but rather by telling lies and pretending that those lies are backed by........

© American Thinker