|
Jeffrey ToobinThe New Yorker |
Mounting questions will go unanswered because of a Supreme Court decision shielding presidents from scrutiny.

The legal precedent established by Maurene Comey’s case may turn out to be far more consequential than the finding in her father’s.

What happens when a President’s physical or mental decline makes him unfit to continue to serve?

More than any other presidential actions, clemencies tell us who presidents are.

For Mr. Trump, there may be few spoils of victory sweeter than the ordeal that they will soon endure.

President Trump’s history of intemperate remarks has earned him a perverse kind of immunity; the more outrageous his statement, the faster it is...

Trump wants his people calling the shots. And Bove has proved, above all, that he belongs to the president.

The process is the penalty, and the penalty is the process.

The federal judiciary is being forced to confront a fundamental question: What to do when its orders are defied?

Only the norms of history and the customs of decency constrain a president — or, as in this case, they don’t.

If the president’s defiance continues, the standoff will create the prospect of a constitutional crisis, and it will be the state attorneys general...

Because presidents exercise such unfettered discretion in granting clemency, these actions provide useful insights into their true character.

Advertisement Supported by Guest Essay By Jeffrey Toobin Mr. Toobin’s book “The Pardon: The Politics of Presidential Mercy” will be published in...
