I have been reading Tocqueville again lately, prompted by our nation’s semiquincentennial celebrations. Looking at where we are today, it is hard not to wonder: if Alexis de Tocqueville showed up in 2026, would he recognize modern America? More importantly, would he bet on us to last another 250 years? I believe he would judge America not by its politics alone, but by the habits and character that support its republic.

Inside Scoop: Big Beautiful rebrand, ‘Nixon-maxxing,’ Burnham’s burden

Mamdani’s bait-and-switch underscores perils of socialism’s promises

Inside Scoop: Genuinely un-American, fight for female sports, California chooses failure

If America’s future will not be settled in Washington alone, then it will be decided in our families, churches, schools, and neighborhoods. These are the places where citizens are formed, and where Tocqueville would ask a central question: do we still possess the habits necessary to maintain our republic?

He would not likely turn to social media to measure the health of the republic. Tocqueville was most interested in the habits, associations, and institutions behind the politics of the day that taught Americans to govern themselves.

A quick stop in Washington, D.C., would likely be on his itinerary. Tocqueville respected the Constitution, including the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the safeguards it placed around liberty. But his stop in D.C. would end as quickly as it began.

You see, Tocqueville was always pulled to places that seldom dominate news coverage: a town council meeting, a classroom, a church where members gather to collaborate on a community service project, or a neighborhood organizing after a storm. Most Americans would see ordinary community life. Tocqueville would see the structure that made liberty possible.

Tocqueville arrived in the United States in 1831, officially to study America’s prisons. What he ultimately produced was profound and enduring.

Coming from post-revolutionary France, he encountered the rough reality of the American frontier. He was truly fascinated by the American people and by how this democracy had succeeded when so many others had failed.

Imagine him watching two farmers pause their work to help a neighbor pull a stubborn stump from a field. Neither was compelled by law. They stopped because custom, duty, and mutual expectation made such assistance ordinary. So the Constitution alone could not explain America’s success. The deeper explanation lay in the habits of its people.

That is the layer of America many observers miss. Many obsess over the chaos of Washington, but Tocqueville kept his eyes on the ground. He spent nine months traveling the young republic, observing frontier settlements, growing cities, judges, ministers, merchants, legislators, farmers, and laborers. More than anything, he watched Americans live together.

He often noticed something Europeans found unusual: Americans were always forming committees, church societies, debating clubs, and improvement associations. Americans instinctively organized. To Tocqueville, these associations were more than civic; they were training grounds for self-government.

His resulting work, Democracy in America, remains a masterclass on the American experiment because he understood the conditions under which free societies flourish and the conditions under which they, almost without recognizing it, forget how to preserve liberty. He saw America’s strengths with unusual clarity, and he also saw dangers that would not fully emerge for generations. That balance of praise and warning explains his enduring lesson for America: Liberty depends on civic habits, not politics alone.

Everywhere he traveled, Tocqueville noticed a peculiar habit. Americans did not wait for government to solve every problem. They solved many themselves. When challenges arose, they did not ask what the government intended to do, but what they could accomplish together. He called this the “art of association.” It did practical work through libraries, charities, churches, and local groups, but it also trained citizens. Associations required people to organize, compromise, build, and contribute.

Leadership emerged through........

© Washington Examiner