President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order directing temporary warning signs outside the Smithsonian‘s National Museum of American History, advising visitors that some exhibits may present a distorted account of America’s past. The order follows a White House report — released, pointedly, on July 4 — questioning whether the museum has drifted from its founding mission and encouraging visitors to consult additional historical resources as the nation marks its 250th anniversary.

Predictably — because it was a Trump executive order — Washington erupted. Critics called it censorship, authoritarianism, and another culture war stunt.

Trump proved America can host the world. Don’t let politics score an own goal now

Why Gen Alpha will make Gen Z look conservative

If ever a policy belonged in a Monty Python sketch, this is it

Here’s the irony. For more than a decade, many of America’s universities and cultural institutions insisted that history itself required warnings — that before encountering a challenging book, a lecture, a monument, or even difficult chapters of America’s past, citizens deserved trigger warnings, content advisories, and sensitivity notices. An entire vocabulary of caution took root across American public life.

I TOURED SMITHSONIAN’S NATIVE AMERICAN MUSEUM. WHAT I SAW WAS PURE ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA

Now a warning label has been directed at a museum, and suddenly the practice is portrayed as an assault on democracy.

One need not agree with Trump’s executive order to recognize the irony. You cannot spend years insisting that Americans need warnings before confronting history and then declare the very idea illegitimate the moment someone else holds the pen.

I do not write as an outsider. I........

© Washington Examiner