The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Don’t be afraid to be anxious.

Anxiety is one of those words that means a hundred different things depending on who’s using it. A clinical disorder. A mood. A personality trait. A vague feeling that you don’t understand but desperately want to resist.

What if some forms of anxiety are more like a signal telling you something deeply true about yourself and the world?

Samir Chopra is a philosopher and the author of Anxiety: A Philosophical Guide. His argument is that anxiety isn’t just a malfunction or a disorder to be eliminated, but a structural feature of being human. We are finite, self-aware, future-oriented creatures, and anxiety is what it feels like to live under those conditions. The goal isn’t to cure anxiety so much as understand it well enough so that it stops ruling us.

I invited Chopra onto The Gray Area to talk about these ideas and what philosophy can and can’t do for people struggling with anxiety. As always, there’s much more in the full podcast, which drops every Monday and Friday, so listen to and follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora, or wherever you find podcasts.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The problem with the word “anxiety” is we use it to describe a lot of different things. Why is there so much confusion around the term?

There’s some disagreement, and there’s also a broad range of experiences that get bundled under the term. We have hundreds of words for these states: worry, stress, fear, and so on. “Anxiety,” as a term, is relatively new, more like an 18th- or 19th-century word that we’ve come to use across cultures. But the phenomenology it covers is wide.

There’s also a kind of turf war. Different disciplines claim authority over anxiety: philosophy, psychology, psychiatry. And that matters, because it affects who gets to treat it and who gets to speak about it as an expert.

In my book, I try for some definitional clarity, but early on, I more or less say that it’s hard to draw sharp boundaries here. The edges are fuzzy. I think we can make a useful distinction between anxiety and fear, and that’s enough to start.

How do you distinguish fear from anxiety?

One influential line comes from Freud: anxiety is fear without a specific object. You feel scared, but there isn’t something determinate right in front of you.

Think of driving to the mountains to go climbing. You wake up, and you’ve got the pit in your stomach, the nausea, the discomfort. Nothing concrete is threatening you. But you can anticipate what might happen: bad weather, getting lost, falling. Those possibilities haven’t taken determinate form yet. That’s anxiety.

Then you’re actually on the climb. You step across a chasm, your footing slips, and you could fall right now. That’s fear, because it has a concrete object.

Or you’re in the woods, and you’re uneasy about dangerous wildlife. That’s anxiety. Then you see the mountain lion on the trail, and your body reacts. That’s fear.

So fear has a clear object. Anxiety doesn’t. And in existentialist treatments, the indeterminate thing is often the future. The future hasn’t arrived yet, so it’s a natural home for anxiety.

So is anxiety basically fear of fear?

Yes. I sometimes call it anticipatory fear. I’m scared of being scared. I can imagine drowning even if I haven’t drowned. I can feel it in my body, the........

© Vox