Listen to this article:

The US-UK “special relationship” is an ideological narcotic for Britain’s ruling classes in the post-colonial era. King Charles’s state visit – featuring a White House banquet and address to Congress – perfectly embodies this narcotic function in a turbulent post-Brexit Britain and a volatile and conflict-ridden second Trump administration waging a war on Iran. The Royal visit formally celebrates 250 years since the 1776 US declaration of independence from British colonial rule (ironically framing separation as enduring kinship) while signalling continuity of elite ties under Trump. Royal symbolism adds cultural prestige, masking policy and power asymmetries (over trade, military spending, and divergences on the Iran war). For Britain’s ruling elites, it reinforces the illusion of equal partnership; for the US, it affirms exceptionalist leadership with a reliable ally. Such rituals help manage hegemony’s turbulence, building consent even as material power leans heavily westward and even that is increasingly in doubt and fast-losing popular and international credibility.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

This particular visit occurs in the midst of a cesspool of scandals that embroils the Royal family, President Trump and his circles, and the British political establishment. The ghost of Jeffrey Epstein haunts the corridors of Anglo-American elite power, leading to the sacking of Peter Mandelson, UK ambassador to the US, laws in America forcing release of millions of files from the Epstein estate, and placing dynamite beneath the seemingly invincible Donald Trump. 

Mass protests are expected to stalk King Charles as he tours the US; rather than cementing the special relationship, it may well more starkly expose its rotten core.

In addition, there are material inequities in the benefits that accrue from the special relationship, reinforcing domestic class and regional inequalities, explored below. 

The “special relationship” persists as a hegemonic delusion: a narcotic sustaining British elite self-image after empire, perfectly compatible with American exceptionalist domination. Historical episodes – from Suez to Iraq – show elites on both sides investing in the ideology because it delivers networked influence, even as it perpetuates hierarchy at home and in Anglo-American relations. The Royal visit ritually renews the dose. True power analysis requires piercing the consensual veil to examine whose interests the order truly serves.

Placing a precise monetary value in pounds on the economic benefits of the special relationship to Britain as a whole is inherently challenging. No official comprehensive cost-benefit analysis isolates the “special” aspects (intelligence sharing, military interoperability, elite networks) from baseline bilateral ties that any close partners might enjoy. Trade, investment, and returns occur in a market context, but the relationship enhances elite stability, market access, technology transfer, and risk mitigation in ways that are hard to quantify.

Using recent official data........

© The Wire