menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Kosherness or Managed Fragility

4 0
previous day

Kosherness as Communal Metabolism

For years, Jewish public discourse has been strongest where danger is visible: security threats, antisemitic violence, geopolitical instability, institutional continuity. It has also been strongest where danger is existentially interpreted: memory, identity, belonging, trauma, historical responsibility. Both grammars are necessary. Neither is sufficient. A third grammar has been neglected, and that neglect is becoming strategic: embodied communal life security. The issue is not symbolic continuity alone, but whether a community can preserve the biological and temporal conditions that make continuity real across generations.

A difficult claim follows. A community can be legally compliant, politically vigilant, culturally articulate, and still become metabolically fragile. This is not a metaphor. It is a structural condition in which institutional success and embodied decline coexist for a long time without triggering conceptual alarm. In practical terms, we now inhabit regimes where procedural legitimacy can mask physiological erosion. What looks stable at the level of certification may be unstable at the level of life capacity.

The Fiction of Procedural Safety

Modern food systems are built on a useful but limited proposition: if products satisfy legal thresholds, pass certification, and remain available at scale, they are safe enough. This proposition is operationally necessary for regulation. It becomes dangerous when elevated into civilizational doctrine. Legal and ritual compliance can evaluate inputs; they do not automatically evaluate long-wave outcomes. That distinction is the center of the problem.

A regime can control residues, approve additives, and enforce standards while still generating a population-level pattern of metabolic dysregulation, inflammatory burden, disrupted sleep architecture, appetite instability, and declining developmental resilience. This is not a contradiction. It is a mismatch between what systems are designed to measure and what communities need to preserve. Systems are optimized to audit components. Life deteriorates through cumulative patterning: repetition, timing, load, stress coupling, and recovery collapse.

At this point, two predictable objections usually appear. The first says: “This is alarmism; life expectancy improved in many places.” Response: life expectancy and life capacity are not equivalent variables, and recent gains in survival can coexist with rising chronic dysfunction. The second says: “You........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)